Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Barack Obama’

The United States of Goldman Sachs

April 21st, 2010 Matt Donatelli No comments

We The People – 4/21/10

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Greetings listeners! We are now broadcasting from the United States of Goldman Sachs! If you want to know just how much sway GS has in our federal government and the Obama administration, listen to this podcast. We investigate the suspicious timing of the S.E.C.’s lawsuit against GS. We also discuss the revolving door between the government and Goldman Sachs, and how regulatory reform isn’t getting us anywhere.

Listen as we interview Hal Martin, economics professor and former real estate consultant, about the current financial situation. We discuss the issues from an Austrian economic perspective, and show how the unimpeded free market would solve these crises.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

The Statist Quo and The Race Against Obamacare

January 18th, 2010 Matt Donatelli No comments

We The People – 1/17/10

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

On tonight’s show, we introduce a new segment, “The Statist Quo: Blame Capitalism.” We break down Obama’s new tax on banks and his recidivist reasoning for raising taxes in the middle of the recession.

Tea Party Youth leader Lyda Loudon also called in to give us an update on how young people can become vocal participants in the Tea Party movement. She explains why so many young people have been attracted to the movement and how we can build even more support for freedom in this year’s election.

Kieth Preston joins us to discuss what Scott Brown and the Massachusetts Special Election could mean for Obama’s health care plans. Also be sure to listen as Dani blasts the dummy of the week, Barney Frank!

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Ten Tiger Tips for Obama

December 16th, 2009 Matt Donatelli 1 comment

by Matt Donatelli

Barack Obama’s legislative and executive inexperience was frequently exposed during the 2008 presidential election, only to be excused by supporters with the argument that: Obama will listen closely to his advisers. After his electoral victory, President Obama showed concerned citizens who his advisers are through cabinet appointments and czar concoctions.

Upon further examination, many of these advisers are radicals with many agendas, few qualifications, and shady dealings. Obama’s Safe Schools Czar, Kevin Jennings, was selected due to his organization of the Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). GLSEN is responsible for promoting dangerous sexual activity to children as young as 14. Timothy Geithner, United States Secretary of the Treasury, was appointed to tackle tax evaders despite his own history of tax evasion. Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director, led a failed attack on the Fox News Network, and has stepped down from office.

None of these appointments placate the citizen concerned with Obama’s inexperience or political leanings. In fact, each adviser shows signs of radicalism, inexperience, and corruption. With all these thoughts tumbling in my mind, I stumbled across this magazine cover in the checkout isle of my local grocer.

golfdigest_cover

What an unfortunate cover story to publish right before the discovery of Tiger’s mistresses, who now number in the double digits. It is surprising that Obama hasn’t appointed a “Publicity Czar” in order to recall all copies of Golf Digest’s January 2010 Issue. Perhaps Chris Matthews at MSNBC has the proper qualifications, or leg tingling sensations, for the job.

In light of Tiger’s infidelity, here is an updated list of “10 Tips Obama can take from Tiger.

1.  Don’t lie if you cheat on your wife

This tip could have saved Bill Clinton from impeachment. Remember that he wasn’t impeached for infidelity; he was impeached for perjuring himself.

2.  Don’t “Just Do It”

Just because you can have a dozen or more mistresses, doesn’t mean you should. The “if it feels good, do it” mentality of the 60’s is no way to run a country.

3.  Don’t leave your Blackberry lying around

It was a hassle for Obama to keep his Blackberry upon becoming president, but he better be careful how he uses it and where he leaves it.

4.  Keep Michelle away from the presidential golf clubs

Still not convinced Tiger got his wounds exclusively from his car accident? Neither am I.

5.  Don’t t-off the tea party protesters

There’s only so much wasteful spending the taxpayer can tolerate.

6.  If you’re playing the wrong hole, take the penalty and move on.

As 1994 proved for Clinton, government mandated healthcare is unpopular legislation.

7.  Be careful where you put your stimulus package.

Funneling taxpayer money to ACORN, sponsor of prostitution, is a no-no.

8.  Rules and regulations won’t stop cheaters.

The answer to corporate greed isn’t a “pay czar,” and Bush’s deregulation didn’t cause the current financial crisis.

9.  Look out for sand traps.

As commander-in-chief, Obama has one shot to succeed in Afghanistan. He needs make it count.

10.  Don’t let fame go to your head.

Obama may be the media darling now, but it’s surprising how suddenly the tides can turn.

The article in question says that Tiger and Obama are, “two men [who] might have much to talk about, like siblings separated at birth.” Now it will be interesting to watch if Tiger can salvage his marriage, sponsors, and golfing career. Similarly, can Obama save healthcare, the Afghanistan war, and the democrats in 2010 and 2012? Let’s “hope” Obama can learn from these tips and “change” his ways.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Oprah and Reaganomics

November 27th, 2009 Ron Meyer No comments

By Ron Meyer

Published in the Santa Barbara News-Press

California’s chief budget analyst, Mac Taylor, shocked Sacramento legislators last Wednesday when he announced some daunting numbers: California will run a $6.3 billion deficit this year and a $14.6 billion deficit next year. Key players at the state capital are already considering raising taxes.

If California raises taxes, they will continue to chase away the state’s main revenue sources: businesses and the rich.

California’s total per capita taxes are the fourth worst in the country; state and local taxes are the sixth worst; individual tax rates are the fourth worst; sales tax rates are the worst; top individual rates are the fourth worst; and the business rates are the third worst. Who would want to live or own a business here?

Well, California is the most beautiful state in the union. When Oprah Winfrey quit her show last week, she said, “[w]hy would anybody stay [in Chicago]? It’s freezing here and I own a mansion in Montecito.”

There’s no doubt it is gorgeous here, but not even Oprah chooses to pay the taxes. Hollywood tabloids have been reporting that she has wanted to live full-time in Montecito for years, but had been advised to stay in Chicago because of California’s exorbitant tax rates.

Oprah is not alone. Many companies, both large and small, do everything they can to avoid paying California taxes. For some this means hiring savvy lawyers, but for most it means relocating. Some companies can’t afford either and just go out of business.

What many in Sacramento don’t realize is that if they raise taxes, the government will actually get less revenue. Many people support raising taxes on businesses and the rich because they can afford to pay more. Well, the fact is they usually don’t end up paying more at all. They evade the taxes, become less productive, or leave.

Raising taxes not only chases away rich people and businesses, but increased rates could further destabilize our already fragile economy. Small business and middle-class Americans are already struggling enough just to keep above water, and the last thing these folks need is one more expense.

A couple weeks ago I had the opportunity to travel an hour west of Santa Barbara to see Ronald Reagan’s Rancho del Cielo. This is where President Reagan signed the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981. Looking into this act and its effects on tax revenue got me thinking: We can boost California’s revenue and the state’s economy if we cut taxes.

People will immediately identify this recommendation with supply-side economics, but don’t get me wrong. Not all taxes are supply-side. Sales taxes and some income taxes are historically revenue-neutral or slightly revenue-negative, meaning that if you decrease the rates, the revenue either stays the same or goes down.

Cuts in business and top individual tax rates are revenue-positive. Whether it was Ronald Reagan’s or JFK’s national tax cuts, or Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s tax cuts for New York City, in almost every case where high business and top individual rates have been cut, the revenue from these taxes has gone up.

To understand why this happens, we should examine the logic behind both tax cuts. First off — as we learned from Oprah — businesses and rich people are less likely to move or avoid taxes when rates are low.

When corporate taxes are lowered, businesses have more money to invest in future ventures — like hiring new employees or buying new machinery — creating more taxable wealth.

Personal tax cuts are often criticized because they usually don’t generate a lot of consumer spending. When we cut taxes for rich people, they usually invest the money in banks, stocks or real estate. These investments go on to make these folks richer (equalling more tax revenue), and they also provide the needed liquidity an economy needs.

When people invest or save money in banks and stocks, it provides small businesses and entrepreneurs access to more capital. More capital means more employees, more machinery, and more land. All three help the economy and bring in additional taxes.

If Sacramento legislators want more money, they need to be counter-intuitive and lower tax rates. Lower tax rates — especially top individual and business rates — would be the stimulus California needs to turn around these droopy unemployment numbers.

It really shouldn’t be difficult politically; most people and business owners certainly won’t complain. Plus, it will keep Oprah in Montecito.

Ron Meyer Jr. is a student at Principia College in St. Louis. He is interning at the News-Press this winter.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

The Elephant in the Room

October 28th, 2009 Ron Meyer No comments

“We don’t want somebody sitting back saying you’re not holding the mop the right way. Why don’t you grab a mop? Why don’t you help clean up?” — President Barack Obama, October 16, 2009

Partisan, rhetorical, and deceptive taunts. What an enticing invitation to the discussion table! I’ll take it.

So far the elephants have been kicked out of the decision-making room. Sen. Olympia Snowe may have bought a spot at the table a couple weeks ago with her committee vote in support of the Baucus bill, but the Democratic leadership hasn’t even come close to letting any other Republicans contribute ideas.

Yes, Republicans do have ideas — “mops,” if you will — but the President apparently doesn’t care or doesn’t want our help. He’d rather deride us.

Last week, I spoke to Rep. John Shimkus (IL-19) who is the Republican congressman from Principia College’s district. During the President’s address to the joint session of congress, Rep. Shimkus held up three GOP bills, which included tort reform, interstate insurance purchasing, and health savings accounts.

The fact is that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have ignored Republican alternatives, and then labeled us as the party of “no.”  During the campaign President Obama promised to move us past the “smallness of our politics.” I guess that’s another “change” that isn’t happening.

The democratic leadership aren’t the only politicans ignoring solutions. Most of DC has missed the elephant in the room, and no, this time I’m not talking about a Republican.

We must reform Medicare and Medicaid; these programs are the single largest reason why health-care costs are so high.

Medicare and Medicaid pay doctors and pharmaceutical companies at a rate set by the federal government. Recently, the Senate voted, but failed to pass, a bill lowering this rate. This would have made the problem even worse.

Medicare and Medicaid already only pay about 85 cents on the dollar of what private costumers pay, and in order to break even, doctors and pharmaceutical companies overcharge private insurers to make up their lost revenue.

Basic economics tells us than when a price is mandated below market value, a shortage develops. However, with only 48% of the industry under these price controls, doctors and pharmaceutical companies can afford to stay in business by just charging the insurance companies more to make up for it. The insurance companies then pass these costs on to consumers through significantly higher premiums.

Oh, and by the way, the seemingly dead public option would multiply these practices.

Medicare and Medicaid have also aided in setting a terrible precedent for insurance companies.

Private insurance plans, following the lead of Medicare and Medicaid, have also begun to include routine procedures and tests. Insurance is designed for when the abnormal happens. Your car insurance doesn’t cover tune-ups; it covers accidents.

When health insurance, Medicare, or Medicaid cover routine procedures and tests, the individual consumer doesn’t care how high the procedure is priced, because someone else is fronting the bill. This raises costs for everyone.

Ok, so there’s no doubt that the semi-socialized programs already fused in our health-care system are bringing up costs. Why haven’t we heard about this from anyone in Washington?

Medicaid and especially Medicare are very popular among people getting the free health-care. The elderly in this nation are a huge voting block. The AARP would freak out if any politician were to mention that these programs need to be reformed. This political pressure has forced even Michael Steele to endorse Medicare.

This is asinine coming from the supposed head of the supposedly fiscally responsible GOP. Medicare and Medicaid are not only hurting our current health-care system, they are on a crash course leading us to unsustainable debt. Without reform, my generation will drown in debt.

We cannot just get rid of Medicare and Medicaid tomorrow. It’s not easy to unwind government reliance. Retirees and near retirees have planned on having this. We have to give everyone involved a better option, not a public option.

For current Medicare and Medicaid recipients, the government should grant them a voucher to choose any plan they prefer. Whatever voucher money they don’t spend they get to keep, incentivizing them to chose wisely and economically. Empowering personal freedom and cutting out the government middleman would bring down prices for all.

This reform, mixed with other policies like tort reform, mandate reduction, interstate insurance purchasing, and health savings accounts, could positively revolutionize our health-care system.

Both sides have mops; mops can do two things: remove dirt or spread it around. The above solutions — clean liberty-based mops — remove the dirt of government intervention. By greatly expanding the government’s control, Obama’s, Reid’s, and Pelosi’s mops just spread more dirt around. Let’s grab the clean mops.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

We do it for the laughs

October 22nd, 2009 Matt Donatelli No comments

Remember, in times of great crisis, humor is your greatest medicine.

Pork Flu

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Categories: Parody Tags: , ,

WTP – Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize

October 11th, 2009 Matt Donatelli No comments

We The People – 10/11/09

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Shidazzle! Here comes the newest podcast of We the People. A veritable yard-sale, this web-cast includes intense coverage and analysis of Obama receiving the Nobel Peace Prize. Do you think he deserved it? Listen to We the People, our guests and callers.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

We The People Podcast – 10/04/09

October 7th, 2009 Matt Donatelli No comments

We The People – 10/04/09

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Ron Meyer reviews an epic week of news with blogger Keith Preston; they hit healthcare, the Olympics, and Obama’s limp magic wand. The former producer of the Michael Reagan Show and current producer of the Roger Hedgecock show Dan Susskind joins WTP to talk about what President Ronald Reagan would have done to fix the recession. To top it off, the leader of the local 9-12 group, Kathy Wassink talks to Ron about citezen activism.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS

Friends with Whom?

April 17th, 2009 Ron Meyer No comments

Enjoy the latest version of the Pilot! 21 mins ago
Friends with whom?
by Ron Meyer
Conservative columnist
Published April 17th, 2009

OK – I get it – former President George W. Bush didn’t exactly have a warm and inviting foreign policy. He lost us some friends and some respect abroad. He did keep the United States safe, but I’m still not sure that excuses his poor communication and negotiation skills. I believe that one of the reasons the American people voted for President Barack Obama and other Democrats was to improve our image abroad.

However, I don’t think voters expected that the majority would attempt to achieve this objective through patronizing foreigners at the country’s expense.

President Obama’s remarks during his trip to Europe for the G-20 meetings were self-deprecating. He took pot-shots at America to gain acceptance in the global community. Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer summed it up well when he said, “Obama indicted his own people for arrogance, for dismissiveness and derisiveness, for genocide, for torture, for Hiroshima, for Guantanamo and for insufficient respect for the Muslim world.” A global summit is not the right time or place to point out all of America’s supposed problems. It’s good for us to take a more humble and open approach to foreign policy, but how humble is too humble?

Along with his nearly anti-American words, President Obama is starting to be liked by some very curious people. Russian President and Putin puppet Dmitry Medvedev called Obama his “new comrade.” Making friends with the combative Russian leadership isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but the problem is that this relationship will only be one-sided.

Obama immediately began talking to Medvedev about removing the U.S. missile shield in Alaska and stopping the plans for one in Poland. If this was Obama’s attempt at reciprocity, what did we get from the Russians? An endorsement of North Korea’s missile test. If Russia and the United States are going to work together in disarmament, let’s make sure they aren’t helping Iran and North Korea proliferate their nuclear programs. This is one reason we should be really skeptical when a sketchy leader like Medvedev calls Obama his “comrade.”

While Obama was getting buddy-buddy with Medvedev, the Congressional Black Caucus took a trip down to Cuba to visit the Castro brothers. Now, being friends with a grumpy Russian is one thing, but hanging out with a couple of Communist dictators takes it to an entirely new level. Rep. Emmanuel Cleaver from Missouri said in a press conference that Raul Castro was, “one of the most amazing human beings I’ve ever met.” Rep. Barbra Lee said that Fidel “looked directly into our eyes,” and “was very engaging and very energetic.”

Do these representatives forget what these men have done to restrict political and religious freedoms in Cuba? Do they not see the mass poverty and caste system that still remains strong?

We should normalize trade relations with Cuba, but there is no excuse for our leaders to go down there and glorify tyranny and oppression. We shouldn’t turn a cold shoulder to the world, but this is no excuse to kiss up to some of the most despicable leaders on the planet.

While being friendly is cool, bowing is a bit much. This is especially true when the person you’re bowing to is the leader of OPEC. Despite the White House’s clumsy denial, it is pretty obvious that President Obama took a bow when meeting with Saudi King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz during his trip abroad a couple weeks ago. This may have been a slip up, but either way, this grants the King too much respect. Not only is this act clearly against protocol, it also brings into question our relations with the leader of the world’s oil cartel.

In every opinion poll, the people in the United States overwhelmingly support moving away from foreign oil. The country wants to use domestic resources and renewable energy. Instead of being beholden to this dictator, I would hope that President Obama and Congress would start working on an energy policy that frees up our domestic resources.

President Bush was all too kind to the Saudi King because he knew we needed the oil. I was hopeful that when we elected President Obama, this would be one of those things he would “change.” I would have liked President Obama to have looked King Abdullah straight in the eyes and told him that America is heading in a new direction on energy. Instead we got more of the same.

I don’t want to be too hard on our rookie president. American foreign relations certainly do need repairing. However, instead of taking literal and symbolic bows to the international community, our government officials should be delivering firm hand shakes. We can talk to whomever we want as long as we do not give up our dignity or national security. There’s nothing wrong with reciprocity, but let’s make sure we negotiate from a position of strength and not subordination.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Categories: Editorial Tags:

Week 2 Podcast

January 26th, 2009 Matt Donatelli No comments

Matt’s Media Madhouse – Week 2

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Week 2 of Matt’s Media Madhouse focuses on the Inauguration of America’s 44th President, Barack Obama. This show features guests such as Katy Gaines, Brian Swanson, and our D.C. correspondent Ron Meyer.

Certain audio clips used within the show are copyrighted to Comedy Central, and MSNBC.

Share with Friends:
  • Print
  • email
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
Categories: MMM, Podcast Tags: ,